Dallas City Council to vote on controversial Forward Dallas 2.0 plan to integrate multifamily housing

Dallas, Texas – In Dallas, a city often characterized by sprawling single-family neighborhoods, the debate over how to integrate more multifamily housing has reached a pivotal moment. The Dallas City Council is set to vote on the Forward Dallas 2.0 land use plan this Wednesday, a decision that has been brewing amid controversy and extensive revisions over the past year.

Read also: Texas State Senator questions legality of Tarrant Appraisal District’s sweeping property tax changes

Forward Dallas 2.0, initially aimed at diversifying housing options in the city, has faced stark opposition from single-family homeowners. Many fear that the plan could dilute their neighborhoods’ character and potentially lead to increased crime rates. During a recent Economic Development Committee meeting, Ed Zahra, a resident of District 14, voiced a common concern: “Single-family zoning is a huge promise to homeowners that is on the chopping block with this latest Dallas Forward 2.0 plan.”

Credit: Getty via Unsplash

However, city officials have consistently reassured the public that the plan does not seek to eliminate single-family zoning outright. Instead, it aims to introduce multifamily units more thoughtfully into predominantly single-family areas. This has not quelled the fears entirely, but it has opened the door to compromise.

In response to public outcry, elected officials amended the plan, gearing it more towards balancing growth with neighborhood integrity. The compromise version of Forward Dallas 2.0 now includes stricter regulations on where multifamily developments can occur, aiming to protect established neighborhoods while still addressing the city’s housing shortage.

Read also: Dallas-based Invitation Homes settles with FTC over undisclosed fees and improper evictions

The revised plan proposes that new multifamily structures, such as duplexes and townhomes, should be located primarily along major arterial roads and near transit stations, rather than infiltrating quiet residential streets. District 12 Council Member Cara Mendelsohn highlighted the importance of this distinction, noting that single-family areas are “the city’s most stable areas” and expressing concern over the potential for increased crime associated with higher-density housing.

At the heart of the Forward Dallas 2.0 debate is a fundamental disagreement over how the city should grow. Proponents like Nate Hemby, a District 4 resident and data engineer, argue that the city needs to adapt its land use to meet changing demographics and housing needs.

“The way we use our land determines how we live, how we get to work, how we interact with our neighborhoods,” Hemby explained to KERA. “One of the positives of defining the way we use the land is it’s going to define how people get to and from your land.”

Credit: Unsplash

He supports the plan because it promises more housing variety, which he found lacking when searching for a home in his preferred area.

Despite these assurances, many residents remain skeptical. The fear of displacement looms large, with concerns that new developments could lead to the demolition of existing homes and the loss of community character. Council Member Paul Ridley has responded to these fears with a set of amendments that aim to ensure any new development respects the character of existing neighborhoods.

The plan now includes provisions to place multiplex and apartment developments away from single-family zones and prioritize density along commercial corridors and near civic institutions. Ridley’s amendments also call for visual buffers to separate single-family homes from more intense adjoining uses, attempting to preserve the peace and privacy of residential areas.

As the city council prepares for the upcoming vote, the conversation continues to evolve. While some council members like Carolyn King Arnold lament the necessity of such intense debate over protecting single-family neighborhoods, others see the plan as a necessary evolution of the city’s urban landscape. Chad West, representing District 1, emphasized the plan’s potential to address housing needs while respecting community fears of incompatibility and displacement.

Forward Dallas 2.0 represents a critical step in managing Dallas’s urban growth. If approved, it will set a precedent for how the city balances the need for more housing with the desire to maintain neighborhood integrity. It’s a delicate balance, one that will shape the future of Dallas for years to come.